Vector Database

📖 Bản tiếng Việt (Vietnamese Edition) Prerequisite: Review the previous module in the ai-data-engineering-pipeline series before proceeding. Executive Summary: The Disruption of Naive RAG and the GraphRAG Era Answer-first: Naive RAG collapses in enterprise environments due to relational blindness, unstructured document chunk destruction, and lack of fine-grained access control. Modern AI architectures combine Knowledge Graphs with vector search (GraphRAG) and event-driven data ingestion to deliver 100% data freshness, 38% higher retrieval precision, and deterministic row-level security. Establishing a Zero-Copy Vector Lakehouse backed by LanceDB and Apache Iceberg v3 delivers sub-50ms retrieval latencies and strict document-level RBAC enforcement while eliminating costly vector database silos. ...

← Previous Chapter: Part 2: Ingestion & Atomic Catalog Chunking | Series Hub | Next Chapter: Part 4: Active RAG & Strict Tool Calling → Prerequisite: Read Part 2: Data Ingestion & E-commerce Chunking: Bringing Product Catalogs to AI to understand the Atomic Chunking model and vector point schema. Answer-first: Hybrid search in Qdrant fuses dense semantic embeddings with sparse lexical tokens via Reciprocal Rank Fusion, boosting Top-10 catalog retrieval recall from 78.2% to 96.8%. Executing payload index pre-filtering directly within HNSW graph traversals enforces strict brand, category, and price boundaries in sub-2ms, while scalar quantization reduces cluster RAM consumption by 75% without sacrificing product discovery relevance. ...

GraphRAG vs Naive RAG: Enterprise Architecture Guide Answer-first: GraphRAG outperforms naive RAG in enterprise applications by combining knowledge graph entity extraction with vector search, resolving complex multi-hop relationship queries accurately. Most RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) implementations look the same: chunk documents, embed them into vectors, store them in a vector database, retrieve by cosine similarity, and inject the top-K chunks into the LLM context. This works for simple document Q&A. It fails systematically for enterprise knowledge bases where the answer to a question depends not on a single document chunk, but on the relationships between dozens of interconnected entities. ...